|
|
Post by tom on May 28, 2016 20:17:46 GMT
I see on the official club site that DTFC are still stating that a new 3GPitch is scheduled to be layed down at the ave this summer. On the old forum I stated that this was never gonna happen & from the iron road I have yet to notice any devolpments so far. Though to be fair to to the CBS board, summer does not start till June 20th @ 06:34  |
|
|
|
Post by Dayvan Cowboy on May 29, 2016 9:44:42 GMT
Speaking about the official club website, anyone know why it's reverted back to the old one? I think that page on 3G was from a couple of years ago, and sadly new FA laws have come into place to make the process a lot less straight forward. I do hope there is still a possibility of a 3G pitch in the pipeline, even if it's not for a few more years yet. Perhaps an official from the club can confirm any developments on this?
|
|
|
|
Post by tom on Jun 3, 2016 17:35:59 GMT
Well I hope something happens because as we are now ground sharing with Dorchester Sports then what is already a quadmire of a pitch come November, I dread to think what our pitch will be like with the prospect of possibly 3, maybe 4 matches a week come Jan/Feb, I hope Jems is looking at the long ball game option :-(
|
|
|
|
Post by cherrymagpie on Jun 6, 2016 11:20:24 GMT
I share those thoughts Tom,
I would love to know the thought process behind this? Income will negligible compared to what AFC Bournemouth / Yeovil Town brought whilst sharing. I stand to be corrected. Our pitch struggles at the best of times! 2 years ago we had 8 weeks of consecutive home games due to cup runs etc. what if this happens again?
I would love to know how close the vote was for the CBS and speak to those members and why they thought this was a good idea? |
|
|
|
Post by seantizz on Jun 6, 2016 11:40:52 GMT
This decision wasn't put to the CBS members. It was a board decision with zilch consultation.
|
|
|
|
3GPitch
Jun 6, 2016 11:56:51 GMT
via mobile
Post by cherrymagpie on Jun 6, 2016 11:56:51 GMT
This decision wasn't put to the CBS members. It was a board decision with zilch consultation. So this isn't considered important enough an issue? I find that very strange and worrying. |
|
|
|
Post by nonleagueweirdo on Jun 6, 2016 12:07:44 GMT
I would also be interested to hear if a decision to install a 3G pitch would be put before members for a formal vote?
At the moment I know that their is a significant amount of work going on to move towards a 3G pitch (something that i support)
Imagine after securing funding for a pitch that the membership then voted against the idea at the eleventh hour?
I have been told that the issue of the pitch will be put before members due to it being a significant one. I would have assumed that a ground share would be the same.
|
|
